|
The PCC's role is to determine whether the issue is related to competence or discipline and then to recommend and/or determine an appropriate course of action.
The PCC may recommend the Council should:
- review the doctor's competence and/or
- review the doctor's fitness to practise medicine and/or
- review the doctor's scope of practice and/or
- refer the subject matter of the investigation to the Police and/or
- counsel the doctor.
The PCC may also make one of the following 'determinations':
- no further steps be taken in relation to the complaint or conviction or
- a charge should be brought against the doctor before the Tribunal or
- in the case of a complaint, the complaint should be submitted to conciliation.
The recommendations and/or determination must be made within 14 days after the PCC has completed its investigation. It must give written notice of any recommendations and/or determination, and the reasons on which they are based to the Registrar and the doctor concerned (and in the case of a complaint, the complainant). The Council must 'promptly' consider the recommendation/s.
If the PCC decides the complaint or conviction should be considered by the HPDT it must frame an appropriate charge and lay it before the HPDT in writing. The HPDT should consider the charge as soon as reasonably practicable.
If the PCC determines the complaint should be the subject of conciliation, it must appoint an independent conciliator to help those concerned resolve the complaint by agreement. If the complaint has not been successfully resolved by agreement, the PCC must promptly decide whether it should lay a charge against the doctor before the HPDT, or whether to make any recommendations to the Council about the doctor; or whether any further steps should be taken in relation to the complaint.
If the PCC determines no further steps should be taken, it must advise the doctor concerned, the Council, and the complainant of the reasons on which the determination is based. |