Skip to main content

The evaluation of RPR

The evaluation of regular practice review (Malatest International)

Download Evaluation report - August 2018 - Evaluation of the Regular Practice Review Programme

Download Evaluation report – March 2018: Evaluation of the Regular Practice Review Programme

Download Evaluation report – August 2017: Evaluation of the Regular Practice Review Programme

Download 2017 Evaluation summary report

Regular practice review (RPR) is a quality improvement process. Its primary purpose is to help maintain and improve the standards of the medical profession by helping individual doctors identify aspects of their performance that could be improved, benefiting not only their own professional development but also the quality of care their patients receive. RPR has been implemented through the bpacnz inpractice programme from July 2013.

In July 2014, Malatest International commenced its evaluation of RPR as implemented through the recertification programme for general registrants administered by bpacnz. The focus of the evaluation is on what is being achieved by RPR.

As with any programme, it is important to evaluate the RPR programme to ensure it is working as intended, to understand outcomes for participating doctors and to inform ongoing programme development.

Council has commissioned an evaluation of the RPR programme to determine whether:

  • RPR helps individual doctors identify areas of strength and areas of their practice that could be improved such as assisting in the planning of professional development
  • Doctors act on the RPR report and make changes
  • RPR helps assure Council that competence is being maintained
  • RPR has any impact on the quality of care being delivered to patients
  • RPR has any impact on indicators that suggest improved clinical outcomes

The evaluation findings are based on self-reported changes from the reviewed doctors which are captured through surveys and interviews. Data is being collected at two points in time, 2 weeks after the RPR and 12 months after the RPR.

The Evaluation report – August 2017: Evaluation of the Regular Practice Review Programme incorporates the most recent survey results. The report includes 355 survey responses and 66 interviews from 2 weeks post RPR. It also includes 163 responses from the 12 month survey and 24 interviews conducted one year after RPR. 

Download 2016 – End of year report – March 2017

Download 2016 – Mid year report – August 2016

Download 2015 – End of year report – February 2016

Download 2015 – Mid year report – October 2015

Download 2014 – End of year report – March 2015

Download 2014 – Interim report – November 2014

Email page
  1. Separate multiple addresses with a comma